Common HowTo



    F-secure antivirus 2012 keygen


    F-secure antivirus 2012 keygen

    F-Secure Anti-Virus. Review: The Finnish security firm F-Secure gains a large percentage of its business from corporate accounts and platform operators, but that doesn't mean that it treats its consumer security suites as a ginger-haired child of indeterminate parentage and poor temperament. F-Secure 2013 focuses on keeping its security ahead of the curve, along with some ease-of-use improvements. However, as other suites emphasize their engine improvements along with an ever-expanding feature set, F-Secure Anti-Virus 2013 ($39.99) and F-Secure Internet Security 2013 ($59.99) remain steadfastly lean while still providing top-rated security. Installation Unlike last year, where F-Secure 2012 had a wonky double-installation process, this year's installation was fast and pain-free. It even installed alongside a competitor, which we experimented with just to see if it worked -- it's not good computer security to have two suites running at once. At around four minutes to complete the install, F-Secure isn't as fast Norton or Trend Micro Titanium, but it's definitely improved this year. Interface Aside from some jargon tweaks to make navigating easier to understand, there are almost no interface changes this year. The main interface still presents itself as two clean, well-designed windows with three main sections. The Computer Security window offers Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics. Just kidding, it's really Status, Tasks, and Statistics. Below that are three buttons for quick actions: Scan, with a drop-down to choose which kind of scan to run; Check for updates; and Settings. Note that the blue-and-yellow shield on Settings means that the changing settings requires approving the User Account Control (UAC. The Online Safety window has an identical design, but with big-buttoned icons for Users, Tasks, and Statistics, and quick links below for Restrict Web content, Restrict browsing, and Create new account. Note that all three of those, plus the Users and Statistics sections, require UAC control. Settings are presented in an equally easy-to-navigate interface, with a basic column on the left for navigation and a main window to toggle controls. Settings opens in a separate window, as do many of F-Secure's control panels, which works against the clean design by foisting clutter on unsuspecting users. However, the absolute worst part of the interface is the new "launch pad," which looks like a Windows desktop widget. It's not, but it's not clear what it is, either. It's a nonpersistent launcher to access different parts of the suite, the only place in the interface from which you can switch between Computer Security and Online Safety. A third tab, F-Secure, takes you to the publisher's Web site, with a drop-down that provides links to Support, Notifications, Settings, and Updates. Its impact on your workflow is annoyingly counterintuitive. It disappears once you click on anything else on your monitor, so to switch between the major sections of F-Secure, you've got to continuously go to either your F-Secure desktop icon, or the system tray. Fantastic security means squat if you impede a user's workflow. Now, this isn't as bad as slowing the system to a crawl, but it's really not a helpful design choice. Features and support When it comes to basic security, F-Secure 2013 offers a solid range of options but again, not many changes from last year's version. Let's start under the hood. F-Secure excels at its security engine, and the most notable changes this year are how it interacts with your Web browser, and how its firewall works to protect you. Relying even more than before on the Deep Guard real-time protection network that was overhauled last year, F-Secure has supplemented the guards so that exploits that are accidentally downloaded get blocked. It scans all downloaded files automatically, too. If a file can't be determined to be safe, F-Secure's DeepGuard kicks in to keep an eye on its behavior. It will alert you if it detects anything untoward. DeepGuard watches out for browser manipulation by malware by doing its filtering on the network level. This also allows F-Secure to protect your browsing session, regardless of which browser you use, without an add-on. This is key because security add-ons have been known to decrease browser stability. Officially, the technology will work with Firefox, Internet Explorer, and finally Chrome, but because it's browser agnostic, it ought to work with any browser the user wants to run. F-Secure's network level monitoring spans the gamut of protection, and strengthens its e-mail and spam protection, too. Other changes include a new feature to allow parents to limit browsing time in any browser from the F-Secure interface, and IPv6 support. File analysis by the suite is based on the age of the file, its prevalence among F-Secure users, how the file made it onto your hard drive, and its digital signature if it has one. Suspicious files are automatically quarantined in a sandbox that's actually a virtual machine. The file is executed safely, and if that reveals nothing conclusive, then the file is monitored as it runs under a kind of "parole" system. If it misbehaves, it gets thrown back into the clink and removed from your computer. F-Secure says that this protocol is effective against heavily encrypted malware. The suite uses both a cloud antivirus database that it calls to for supplemental security verification, but it also relies on the local database. E-mail protection is comprehensive, and works with POP, IMAP, and SMTP. There's also a spam blocker and phishing protection. Both the full-featured Internet Security version and the more basic Anti-Virus version are a bit light on features when compared with their competitors, and they're priced about the same as the competition, too. F-Secure Anti-Virus 2013 comes with antivirus, anti-malware, and only basic privacy protections. Even Web guards are only in the upgrade to Internet Security. Yet it lacks some obvious options, like a silent gaming mode, online storage or backup, or a secure file shredder. While not required, when the competition offers features you don't, it makes it hard to compare fairly. The feature thinness isn't new, as it's been a common complaint about F-Secure. However, as you'll see in the Performance section below, it hasn't hurt the suites' effectiveness at blocking the bad guys. Performance Whatever else you can say about F-Secure, its performance is practically unimpeachable. Nearly across the board, last year's F-Secure 2012 was one of the most effective suites reviewed, and early numbers indicate that F-Secure 2013 is once again one of the toughest suites on the block. CNET Labs ' results on system testing showed that the suites slipped a bit to leave an about-average impact on your computer, but the independent malware defense testing showed that F-Secure is rock-solid on security. Since F-Secure Internet Security 2013 shares an engine with F-Secure Anti-Virus 2013. CNET Labs benchmarked both. CNET Labs found that F-Secure's system impact was, in fact, nearly right where the averages were all the suites we've tested so far this year. It was significantly better than average in two categories: scan times, which were around 500 seconds faster than average, and among the fastest recorded; and F-Secure Internet Security's wake from sleep time, 3.3 seconds faster than average. Overall, this is a bit off of last year's F-Secure marks, but still good numbers. F-Secure did very well in real-world scan time tests. It averaged 2 minutes, 21 seconds, for the first "virus and spyware" scan and 4 seconds for subsequent fast scans; meanwhile, the full scan averaged around 56 minutes, but that was after a Quick Scan already had indexed files. Still, that's fairly quick for a Full Scan. Note: All tests measured in seconds, except for Cinebench. On the Cinebench test, higher numbers are better. Independent testing agency has marked consistently superb scores for F-Secure Internet Security 2012. On a test in September and October 2012 on a Windows 7 computer, F-Secure 2012 and 2013 scored a perfect 6 out of 6 on Protection, 5 out of 6 on Repair, and 4.5 out of 6 on Usability, for an overall score of 15.5 out of 18 and clearing the minimum of 11 for an certificate. That earned it second place, behind only Bitdefender. The July and August 2012 test on Windows XP also put F-Secure Internet Security 2012 in second place, this time behind Kaspersky. F-Secure notched another perfect 6 on Protection, 3.5 on Repair, and 5.5 on Usability, for 15 out of 18. May and June's test on Windows 7 was another excellent outing for F-Secure Internet Security 2012, with straight 5.5's out of 6 for all three categories. That tied it for second with Kaspersky, behind the leader Bitdefender. Note that defines its categories as follows: "The 'Protection' covers static and dynamic malware detection, including real-world zero-day attack testing. In case of 'Repair,' we check the system disinfection and rootkit removal in detail. The 'Usability' testing includes the system slowdown caused by the tools and the number of false positives. In short, found F-Secure 2012 and 2013 to be among the most effective security protection around. The most recent Whole Product test, which looks at on-demand scanning, retroactive tests, and "real-world" guards including cloud-based protections, puts F-Secure 2012 in the top two suites tested. The November 2012 test found that it blocked 99.8 percent of attacks and threats thrown at it, tied for second with BullGuard and behind a three-way tie at first between Bitdefender, Gdata, and Trend Micro Titanium. Meanwhile, looking at Whole Product test results cumulatively from January 2012 to November 2012 found that F-Secure 2012 came in third only to Bitdefender and Gdata, blocking 99.3 percent of threats, with an additional 0.2 percent protection gained from adjusting settings. That's better than last year, where F-Secure placed the same on slightly weaker numbers. It's fair to conclude that according to third-party tests, F-Secure has been highly effective over the past year, and if that's your most important standard, then you'd be aiming high by choosing it. Conclusion F-Secure falls a bit short where it's always struggled: with the value-added, high-end features. Even some basic pay-for-play suite components like a silent running entertainment mode are absent. However, there's no doubt that it offers a one-two combo of small system performance impact and stringent security, and on those counts is one of the best suites we've seen this year. F-Secure's not the only high-performing suite out there, and so we can't give it a higher rating. | Version: F-Secure Anti-Virus 2011. WORKED IN BASIC WAY. WOULD NOT REMOVE CERTAIN VIRUSES ADVISED YOU REMOVE THEN MANUALLY WITHOUT CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS-IS'NT THIS WAY YOU BUY ANTIVIRUS. PURCHASED THE F SECURE ON LINE FOR 1 YEAR.( THE 3RD YEAR I'D BOUGHT IT) 20 DAYS FROM THE RENEWAL DATE THEY STOPPED THE ANTIVIRUS PROTECTION. I CONTACTED THEIR CUSTOMER SERVICES FOR A REFUND BUT THEY REFUSED,BUT OFFERED ME 90 DAYS EXTRA ON RENEWAL OR DO THEY MEAN 60 DAYS REALLY. THE PROTECTION ITSELF WAS A BIT LIMITED ,NOW I'M USING WHICH SEEMS A LOT BETTER. Good AV, I suggest use the F-SECURE IS 2011. 2010-10-24 20:37:31 | By trickpirata. | Version: F-Secure Anti-Virus 2011. 1. Great interface 2. Good detection rate. 1. Slow boot time(my specs: Intel i3, 2gb or RAM, nvidia gt325m cuda, windows 7 pro genuine, 320gb HDD. The bottom line is, get the IS because IS has full protection capability. The only CONS in this product is the boot time increase. used for 1.5 years. No virus No Problems It works well. 2010-08-17 16:54:19 | By Junkmanme. | Version: F-Secure Anti-Virus 2010. It seems to do the job well. If I haven't gotten any viruses, it MUST BE GOOD. It isn't FREE. But, good stuff USUALLY isn't. although I've got some VERY GOOD "free" programs, also. I don't know enough about computers to give any "detail". It is easy to use and apparently does the job well. No viruses in One and a Half years. Who's to argue with SUCCESS. February 25, 2010 | By dskanth. 2010-02-25 21:35:49 | By dskanth. | Version: F-Secure Anti-Virus 2010. It has some good interface and icons. Does not fit well in my system and takes a lot of space. Dont install this product. I have tried this and got my system crashed in few hours. It has disabled my internet connection (LAN) and whatever i tried to restore it back, did not work. Finally i have installed a fresh XP OS and removed this shit. Also i found that it consumes a lot of disk space. So i would never recommend this product to anyone. Now iam using Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 and found it to be damn good. lass space takes and perfume wall. 2009-05-17 01:22:22 | By lavinio66. | Version: F-Secure Anti-Virus 2009. It is a reasonable anti interface is plain but easy to use.I. The bootup and shutdown speed are quite long as so are the interface will not win any art lets a few minor nasties through which superantispyware deals firwall is quite weak and should at least be two way. It does the job but is quite needs a better firewall.I think the anti spy and malware needs to be beefed up.I think there are better solutions out there. It has been working good. 2009-01-28 10:55:28 | By khelben1979. | Version: F-Secure Anti-Virus 2009. This is a pretty good anti-virus program, although. I personally like Sophos better. It has been working stable and it's easy to use. This is bad product in comparison to what other companys can offer today year 2009. If you buy it you will get dissipointed. Well. It's easy to use, it works, it is a serious product but it get badly beaten up by the competition from other companys in my opinion. You'll be better off with Sophos. 2009-01-03 16:04:10 | By davidlee099. | Version: F-Secure Anti-Virus 2009. What's there to like about this. This anti-virus software is totally messed up. It slows down your system and consumes great amounts of system resources. The scanner just gets stuck at like 52349 forever and takes quite a while to scan. Maybe it's just not for Windows Vista, or it's not for anyone.


Copyright © 1999-2016, Apache Software Foundation